<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Medal of Freedom&#8217;s risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cipcol.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722</link>
	<description>Peace, security, human rights and the U.S. role in Latin America, from the Center for International Policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:36:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>Mexico: In an interview with Mexico&#039;s El Universal daily, DOD official Richard Douglas stated that the use of the US military to combat drug trafficking is &quot;advisable.&quot; Douglas indicated that at the request of the US border states, the US National Guard would be used to protect the border from Mexican organized crime.

Mexico: The US Department of Treasury disclosed on 18 January that at least USD17.2 billion have been laundered through Mexico in the past two years. Bulk cash transfers are frequent along the US&#039; southwestern border. And between Mexico and Colombia, between USD18 and 39 billion are laundered annually.

Mexico: According to Jose A. Ortega, the president of Mexico&#039;s Citizen&#039;s Council for Public Security and Penal Justice, over 5,500 people died in Mexico in 2008 due to criminal violence. This figure is 20% higher than the total number of US military deaths in Iraq since the start of the war in May, 2003. Ortega has also reported that there were 1,028 kidnappings in Mexico in 2008, and some 65 of those victims were killed. Additionally, some 205 murders have been registered for 2009. That&#039;s nearly twice the number of murders registered over the same time period in 2008.

Mexico: Mexico&#039;s military push into the states of Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, called Operation
Northeast, has been reinforced with 300 soldiers, sent to the city of Reynosa.

Mexico: Two top officials with Interpol in Mexico, Rodolfo de la Guardia Garcia and Ricardo Gutierrez Vargas have been sent to a federal prison in Nayarit. They were found guilty of collaboration with organized crime by furnishing strategic information in exchange for monthly cash payments. 

Kyle,

all of those good people who look away in the US Congress need a good dose of reality

stop this madness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mexico: In an interview with Mexico&#8217;s El Universal daily, DOD official Richard Douglas stated that the use of the US military to combat drug trafficking is &#8220;advisable.&#8221; Douglas indicated that at the request of the US border states, the US National Guard would be used to protect the border from Mexican organized crime.</p>
<p>Mexico: The US Department of Treasury disclosed on 18 January that at least USD17.2 billion have been laundered through Mexico in the past two years. Bulk cash transfers are frequent along the US&#8217; southwestern border. And between Mexico and Colombia, between USD18 and 39 billion are laundered annually.</p>
<p>Mexico: According to Jose A. Ortega, the president of Mexico&#8217;s Citizen&#8217;s Council for Public Security and Penal Justice, over 5,500 people died in Mexico in 2008 due to criminal violence. This figure is 20% higher than the total number of US military deaths in Iraq since the start of the war in May, 2003. Ortega has also reported that there were 1,028 kidnappings in Mexico in 2008, and some 65 of those victims were killed. Additionally, some 205 murders have been registered for 2009. That&#8217;s nearly twice the number of murders registered over the same time period in 2008.</p>
<p>Mexico: Mexico&#8217;s military push into the states of Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, called Operation<br />
Northeast, has been reinforced with 300 soldiers, sent to the city of Reynosa.</p>
<p>Mexico: Two top officials with Interpol in Mexico, Rodolfo de la Guardia Garcia and Ricardo Gutierrez Vargas have been sent to a federal prison in Nayarit. They were found guilty of collaboration with organized crime by furnishing strategic information in exchange for monthly cash payments. </p>
<p>Kyle,</p>
<p>all of those good people who look away in the US Congress need a good dose of reality</p>
<p>stop this madness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5663/t/4571/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=797</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5663/t/4571/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=797" rel="nofollow">http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5663/t/4571/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=797</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>http://colombiareports.com/opinion/111-colombiamerican/2617-plan-colombia-obama-style.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://colombiareports.com/opinion/111-colombiamerican/2617-plan-colombia-obama-style.html" rel="nofollow">http://colombiareports.com/opinion/111-colombiamerican/2617-plan-colombia-obama-style.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El ComÃºn</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4737</link>
		<dc:creator>El ComÃºn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4737</guid>
		<description>Interesting article Chris. According to the UNDP, only Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Bolivia have a higher Gini (inequality) index than Colombia. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_america#Inequality_and_poverty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article Chris. According to the UNDP, only Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Bolivia have a higher Gini (inequality) index than Colombia. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_america#Inequality_and_poverty" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_america#Inequality_and_poverty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>America, America

God shed his grace on thee


Camilla, this is your land but it&#039;s also my land...lol

don&#039;t think I am unaware of the poverty in the deep South that gave birth to your War on Drugs scam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America, America</p>
<p>God shed his grace on thee</p>
<p>Camilla, this is your land but it&#8217;s also my land&#8230;lol</p>
<p>don&#8217;t think I am unaware of the poverty in the deep South that gave birth to your War on Drugs scam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4735</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4735</guid>
		<description>http://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/ARCHIVO/ARCHIVO-4760445-0.pdf

This was on El Tiempo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/ARCHIVO/ARCHIVO-4760445-0.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/ARCHIVO/ARCHIVO-4760445-0.pdf</a></p>
<p>This was on El Tiempo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m watching too Camilla.... in repugnance....



There has been a new response posted to the following discussion on Change.org:
Biden, drug warrior 

----------------------------------------------
  Former New Mexico Republican Governor, Gary Johnson, for Drug Czar  
    Our Citizen Governor, Gary Johnson is a GENUINE &quot;maverick&quot; unlike the ersatz one that the Republicans put up for VP in 2008.  I remember the day he came out for the legalization of marijuana.  I read it in a one paragraph news-bite on an inside page of the Santa Fe New Mexican. The Republican Party came down on him like a &quot;ton of bricks&quot;.  The Dems vied to outdo one another righteous, anti-drug/crime posturing.  The Governor fell silent, for some weeks.
     Then he held a press conference and said that he had studied the issue and concluded that all &quot;drugs&quot; should be legalized, regulated, and taxed.  He spend the balance of his second and final term as Governor arguing the case cogently and convincingly.  The Drug Policy Alliance held their annual Conference in Albuquerque in 2001, and the Governor gave the Welcome Address.  I&#039;ve never been happier to be living in New Mexico.

Gary Johnson has the savy and integrity to end the costly, failed &quot;War on Drugs&quot; and create a system of regulation that will begin to gain control of the untenable situation that Prohibition has created; instead of the enormous cost in public dollars and broken lives, we can generate income for the depleted public purse.

End Prohibition (again).  Gary Johnson for &quot;Drug Czar&quot;!


posted by Victoria Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m watching too Camilla&#8230;. in repugnance&#8230;.</p>
<p>There has been a new response posted to the following discussion on Change.org:<br />
Biden, drug warrior </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
  Former New Mexico Republican Governor, Gary Johnson, for Drug Czar<br />
    Our Citizen Governor, Gary Johnson is a GENUINE &#8220;maverick&#8221; unlike the ersatz one that the Republicans put up for VP in 2008.  I remember the day he came out for the legalization of marijuana.  I read it in a one paragraph news-bite on an inside page of the Santa Fe New Mexican. The Republican Party came down on him like a &#8220;ton of bricks&#8221;.  The Dems vied to outdo one another righteous, anti-drug/crime posturing.  The Governor fell silent, for some weeks.<br />
     Then he held a press conference and said that he had studied the issue and concluded that all &#8220;drugs&#8221; should be legalized, regulated, and taxed.  He spend the balance of his second and final term as Governor arguing the case cogently and convincingly.  The Drug Policy Alliance held their annual Conference in Albuquerque in 2001, and the Governor gave the Welcome Address.  I&#8217;ve never been happier to be living in New Mexico.</p>
<p>Gary Johnson has the savy and integrity to end the costly, failed &#8220;War on Drugs&#8221; and create a system of regulation that will begin to gain control of the untenable situation that Prohibition has created; instead of the enormous cost in public dollars and broken lives, we can generate income for the depleted public purse.</p>
<p>End Prohibition (again).  Gary Johnson for &#8220;Drug Czar&#8221;!</p>
<p>posted by Victoria Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilla</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>Not all,  maremoto. I&#039;m just watching, fascinated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all,  maremoto. I&#8217;m just watching, fascinated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El ComÃºn</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>El ComÃºn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>How to Win the War on Drugs (Illegal Immigration)

1. Reduce U.S. demand for drugs (foreign workers): We could start by increasing emphasis on drug treatment and education as well as enforcing drug laws among both rich and poorâ€¦instead of just the poor (enforcing laws against hiring undocumented workers, prosecuting businesses who hire them instead of rounding up undocumented workers and their families in â€œdetention centersâ€). Politicians, wanting to look â€œtoughâ€, prefer to appeal to our worst instincts by emphasizing drug interdiction (border fences) and blaming the drug (immigration) problem on â€œaliensâ€ rather than on our own peopleâ€™s insatiable appetite for drugs (cheap labor).
 
2. Improve the living conditions of impoverished coca farmers (jobless peasants who would otherwise immigrate).

3. Decriminalize drugs (guest worker program). George Shultz &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DEFD7103FF937A25751C1A96F948260&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; gets it&lt;/a&gt; (so does the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uschamber.com/issues/index/immigration/default&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U.S. Chamber of Commerce&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to Win the War on Drugs (Illegal Immigration)</p>
<p>1. Reduce U.S. demand for drugs (foreign workers): We could start by increasing emphasis on drug treatment and education as well as enforcing drug laws among both rich and poorâ€¦instead of just the poor (enforcing laws against hiring undocumented workers, prosecuting businesses who hire them instead of rounding up undocumented workers and their families in â€œdetention centersâ€). Politicians, wanting to look â€œtoughâ€, prefer to appeal to our worst instincts by emphasizing drug interdiction (border fences) and blaming the drug (immigration) problem on â€œaliensâ€ rather than on our own peopleâ€™s insatiable appetite for drugs (cheap labor).</p>
<p>2. Improve the living conditions of impoverished coca farmers (jobless peasants who would otherwise immigrate).</p>
<p>3. Decriminalize drugs (guest worker program). George Shultz <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DEFD7103FF937A25751C1A96F948260" rel="nofollow"> gets it</a> (so does the <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/issues/index/immigration/default" rel="nofollow">U.S. Chamber of Commerce</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>Sanho Tree (forgive me for name-dropping) once commented to me and the others we were with that many Congresspeople vote for anti-drug (or pro-War on Drugs) measures mainly because they do not want to appear soft on drugs (at least in their minds) because they fear that they will be torn apart by their constituencies and then lose their seat, seemingly equating it with political suicide. I would argue that most Congresspeople have a very face-value level of knowledge with regards to Colombia, and so they may not have ulterior motives but may just think its best for their careers (and some may think best for the country due to ignorance) to vote for what they see as international anti-drug measures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanho Tree (forgive me for name-dropping) once commented to me and the others we were with that many Congresspeople vote for anti-drug (or pro-War on Drugs) measures mainly because they do not want to appear soft on drugs (at least in their minds) because they fear that they will be torn apart by their constituencies and then lose their seat, seemingly equating it with political suicide. I would argue that most Congresspeople have a very face-value level of knowledge with regards to Colombia, and so they may not have ulterior motives but may just think its best for their careers (and some may think best for the country due to ignorance) to vote for what they see as international anti-drug measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4724</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4724</guid>
		<description>In case anybody missed this from Politico&#039;s blog

Comment by Russ Belville â€” January 13, 2009 @ 2:31 pm


The El Paso City Council votes tonight on whether to overturn the mayorâ€™s veto on their unanimous recommendation that El Paso ask its federal representatives to just begin the discussion about drug prohibition and whether we need to re-think our strategies in the War On (Certain American Citizens Using Non-Pharmaceutical, Non-Alcoholic, Tobacco-Free) Drugs in light of failing economies and Mexican drug cartel violence.

Imagine - the city that started marijuana prohibition 94 years ago might be the first city to help end it!

The Attorney General of Arizona, dismayed by the Mexican drug cartel violence, voices an opinion that we ought to just legalize marijuana, as that would take 70% of the cartelâ€™s profit - but then backs away because there are â€œstill hurdles to clearâ€ regarding legalization.

Glenn Greenwald in Salon was reporting on the Israeli offensive into Gaza. He notes that Democratic voters oppose and Republican voters support the offensive, but on the whole, the people are evenly divided on the issue. Greenwald asked if there is any other issue where the public is evenly divided, yet the politicians on both sides of the aisle are in complete lockstep agreement?

Legalizing marijuana would be that issue. The most recent Zogby polls have shown a 49%-48% plurality in favor of taxing and regulating marijuana like Jagermeister or Bacardi 151, and polls over this decade have consistently shown support for medical uses of marijuana at between 70%-80%. Yet our politicians march in 100% lockstep toward supporting the continuation of harassment, arrest, and incarceration of marijuana users and seizure of their property.

Wake up, Washington! The People by a &gt;70% margin believe the War on Drugs is a failure. Your failure to heed the will of The People tells us you have ulterior motives in maintaining prohibition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anybody missed this from Politico&#8217;s blog</p>
<p>Comment by Russ Belville â€” January 13, 2009 @ 2:31 pm</p>
<p>The El Paso City Council votes tonight on whether to overturn the mayorâ€™s veto on their unanimous recommendation that El Paso ask its federal representatives to just begin the discussion about drug prohibition and whether we need to re-think our strategies in the War On (Certain American Citizens Using Non-Pharmaceutical, Non-Alcoholic, Tobacco-Free) Drugs in light of failing economies and Mexican drug cartel violence.</p>
<p>Imagine &#8211; the city that started marijuana prohibition 94 years ago might be the first city to help end it!</p>
<p>The Attorney General of Arizona, dismayed by the Mexican drug cartel violence, voices an opinion that we ought to just legalize marijuana, as that would take 70% of the cartelâ€™s profit &#8211; but then backs away because there are â€œstill hurdles to clearâ€ regarding legalization.</p>
<p>Glenn Greenwald in Salon was reporting on the Israeli offensive into Gaza. He notes that Democratic voters oppose and Republican voters support the offensive, but on the whole, the people are evenly divided on the issue. Greenwald asked if there is any other issue where the public is evenly divided, yet the politicians on both sides of the aisle are in complete lockstep agreement?</p>
<p>Legalizing marijuana would be that issue. The most recent Zogby polls have shown a 49%-48% plurality in favor of taxing and regulating marijuana like Jagermeister or Bacardi 151, and polls over this decade have consistently shown support for medical uses of marijuana at between 70%-80%. Yet our politicians march in 100% lockstep toward supporting the continuation of harassment, arrest, and incarceration of marijuana users and seizure of their property.</p>
<p>Wake up, Washington! The People by a &gt;70% margin believe the War on Drugs is a failure. Your failure to heed the will of The People tells us you have ulterior motives in maintaining prohibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4723</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4723</guid>
		<description>selected passages...

	 
Mike G. 
1/12/2009 8:27 PM	
The war on drugs only creates more crime and criminalizes non violent people. Addiction should be treated as a disease as not a law enforcement issue. Treating the problem effectively and helping people get through their addictions is a much better way to get them to confront their problems rather than treating them like some low-life form of society that has no hope.

&quot;Change&quot; and &quot;Hope&quot; is what we heard from our President as we elected him and we the people demand that you help give addicts hope to get their lives back on track.



	 
Robbie Alford 
1/12/2009 4:30 PM	
I&#039;m behind marijuana legalization 100%.  I&#039;ll be honest..  I like smoking pot for recreation.  HOWEVER, let&#039;s also mention the overcrowded prisons where rapists get paroled in order to make room for any unfortunate guy who sells a pound a weed.. to me that&#039;s a crime.


	 
Spaceshipearth 
1/12/2009 3:17 PM	
 Responsible consumption of marijuana within an appropriate setting is a personal choice, and thus should not be deemed a criminal act. However, regulation of marijuana is important, just as regulation of alcohol is important (age restrictions, restrictions on vehicle operation while intoxicated, etc). 

The dangers to society that marijuana use presents come only from the laws against it. Many individuals are jailed as pot-smokers, and are released as criminals as a result of that imprisonment. They are unable to find decent employment because of a criminal record, etc. Our law enforcement agencies have far more important issues to spend their resources on. In addition, we can gain so much economically and environmentally from the use of  non-THC industrial hemp that it is ridiculous for us to be so afraid of its propagation. 

The illegality of marijuana is a closed-minded, myopic remnant of the way we governed ourselves in the past, with fear and prejudice. Now that we have finally elected an open-minded administration, it is time we move forward in all areas of our society, including irresponsible criminalization of a plant. 


	 
Blakester 
1/12/2009 2:39 PM	
The government should only ask itself one question... &quot;Is it safe?&quot;  They should invest in a public study on its effects and make the results of that study accessible to all.  My belief is that the results will be overwhelmingly supportive in showing that marijuana is a safe recreational substance.

If it is found that marijuana significantly endangers the lives of its users or the lives of people around them, then the prohibition should rightfully continue.  

If, however, it is found to be safe... then there is no legal basis for continuing to make it illegal.

Let the scientific research begin!


	 
Boots 
1/12/2009 11:32 AM	
Ending Marijuana Prohibition will end the increasing number of  marijuana gardens planted by illeagal aliens with mafia style guards throughout the west. This dangerous problem hit home with myself when on a &quot;nature tour &quot; with small children and their parents on my own property, we accidentatly stumbled upon several acres of marijuana.
After calling in the police, there was found to be burried amunition, that we had actually interupted the dinner of the hidden illegal gardeners, there was approximately four months of garbage, human bio-waste(!) and tissues, thousands of feet of tubing, and the small special force of narcotic agents filled an enormous truck with marijuana with a street value of $15 million dollars. Our lives were threatened and the  sense of peace and security on our own land was forever changed. If Marijuana was legal these people who cross the border and use our personal property and national parks for their pot gardens would not be able to sell their goods and would at least on this issue go back to where ever they came from.
We raise purebred horses on this land and we are still cleaning up the mess from these people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>selected passages&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike G.<br />
1/12/2009 8:27 PM<br />
The war on drugs only creates more crime and criminalizes non violent people. Addiction should be treated as a disease as not a law enforcement issue. Treating the problem effectively and helping people get through their addictions is a much better way to get them to confront their problems rather than treating them like some low-life form of society that has no hope.</p>
<p>&#8220;Change&#8221; and &#8220;Hope&#8221; is what we heard from our President as we elected him and we the people demand that you help give addicts hope to get their lives back on track.</p>
<p>Robbie Alford<br />
1/12/2009 4:30 PM<br />
I&#8217;m behind marijuana legalization 100%.  I&#8217;ll be honest..  I like smoking pot for recreation.  HOWEVER, let&#8217;s also mention the overcrowded prisons where rapists get paroled in order to make room for any unfortunate guy who sells a pound a weed.. to me that&#8217;s a crime.</p>
<p>Spaceshipearth<br />
1/12/2009 3:17 PM<br />
 Responsible consumption of marijuana within an appropriate setting is a personal choice, and thus should not be deemed a criminal act. However, regulation of marijuana is important, just as regulation of alcohol is important (age restrictions, restrictions on vehicle operation while intoxicated, etc). </p>
<p>The dangers to society that marijuana use presents come only from the laws against it. Many individuals are jailed as pot-smokers, and are released as criminals as a result of that imprisonment. They are unable to find decent employment because of a criminal record, etc. Our law enforcement agencies have far more important issues to spend their resources on. In addition, we can gain so much economically and environmentally from the use of  non-THC industrial hemp that it is ridiculous for us to be so afraid of its propagation. </p>
<p>The illegality of marijuana is a closed-minded, myopic remnant of the way we governed ourselves in the past, with fear and prejudice. Now that we have finally elected an open-minded administration, it is time we move forward in all areas of our society, including irresponsible criminalization of a plant. </p>
<p>Blakester<br />
1/12/2009 2:39 PM<br />
The government should only ask itself one question&#8230; &#8220;Is it safe?&#8221;  They should invest in a public study on its effects and make the results of that study accessible to all.  My belief is that the results will be overwhelmingly supportive in showing that marijuana is a safe recreational substance.</p>
<p>If it is found that marijuana significantly endangers the lives of its users or the lives of people around them, then the prohibition should rightfully continue.  </p>
<p>If, however, it is found to be safe&#8230; then there is no legal basis for continuing to make it illegal.</p>
<p>Let the scientific research begin!</p>
<p>Boots<br />
1/12/2009 11:32 AM<br />
Ending Marijuana Prohibition will end the increasing number of  marijuana gardens planted by illeagal aliens with mafia style guards throughout the west. This dangerous problem hit home with myself when on a &#8220;nature tour &#8221; with small children and their parents on my own property, we accidentatly stumbled upon several acres of marijuana.<br />
After calling in the police, there was found to be burried amunition, that we had actually interupted the dinner of the hidden illegal gardeners, there was approximately four months of garbage, human bio-waste(!) and tissues, thousands of feet of tubing, and the small special force of narcotic agents filled an enormous truck with marijuana with a street value of $15 million dollars. Our lives were threatened and the  sense of peace and security on our own land was forever changed. If Marijuana was legal these people who cross the border and use our personal property and national parks for their pot gardens would not be able to sell their goods and would at least on this issue go back to where ever they came from.<br />
We raise purebred horses on this land and we are still cleaning up the mess from these people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4722</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4722</guid>
		<description>Camilla are you okay?  you are actually disowning Sean &quot;little ball o&#039; hate&quot; Hannity?

could it really be, oh Camilla?

lol  no way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camilla are you okay?  you are actually disowning Sean &#8220;little ball o&#8217; hate&#8221; Hannity?</p>
<p>could it really be, oh Camilla?</p>
<p>lol  no way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilla</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4721</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4721</guid>
		<description>OT, but it&#039;s very weird - Hannity has taken up the anti-AUC banner, blasting Holder&#039;s defense of Chiquita. I doubt he knows who any of these people are, but he&#039;ll reliably say anything to take down Holder and make Obama unhappy:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,480072,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT, but it&#8217;s very weird &#8211; Hannity has taken up the anti-AUC banner, blasting Holder&#8217;s defense of Chiquita. I doubt he knows who any of these people are, but he&#8217;ll reliably say anything to take down Holder and make Obama unhappy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,480072,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,480072,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>Jon Stewart rocks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart rocks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kyle 

Makes me happy that somebody at least is frank about this stuff

On the other hand my passion comes at a price to by soul, my loved ones and my life

What the heck, I&#039;ll admit it, I love exposing these hypocrites and agitating for if not jailing them for distorting our existence then calling them names ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kyle </p>
<p>Makes me happy that somebody at least is frank about this stuff</p>
<p>On the other hand my passion comes at a price to by soul, my loved ones and my life</p>
<p>What the heck, I&#8217;ll admit it, I love exposing these hypocrites and agitating for if not jailing them for distorting our existence then calling them names <img src='http://www.cipcol.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4718</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4718</guid>
		<description>Good call LFM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call LFM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lfm</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4717</link>
		<dc:creator>lfm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4717</guid>
		<description>OK, so the whole episode of Uribe and his PMoF medal is almost over. As usual, Adam made a good analysis of it but I now guess that weÂ´ve all been making a tempest in a teapot and really overanalyzing this. I mean, from UribeÂ´s point of view IÂ´m sure heÂ´s actually proud of the PMoF, I doubt he lobbied for it in any shape, manner or form (if he did, thatÂ´d be a juicy tidbit). So, what was he to do? HeÂ´s one day sitting in his office, minding his own business (just not to digress I wonÂ´t say how) and then he gets the thrilling phone call. Does he say &quot;thanks, but no, thanks&quot; to the President of the U S of A, the Supreme-Court Appointed &quot;leader of the free world&quot;, his old-time buddy, George &quot;IÂ´m kinÂ´a disappointed I destroyed a whole country for no good reason&quot; Bush? Of course not! I doubt there was any room for strategic decision-making here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so the whole episode of Uribe and his PMoF medal is almost over. As usual, Adam made a good analysis of it but I now guess that weÂ´ve all been making a tempest in a teapot and really overanalyzing this. I mean, from UribeÂ´s point of view IÂ´m sure heÂ´s actually proud of the PMoF, I doubt he lobbied for it in any shape, manner or form (if he did, thatÂ´d be a juicy tidbit). So, what was he to do? HeÂ´s one day sitting in his office, minding his own business (just not to digress I wonÂ´t say how) and then he gets the thrilling phone call. Does he say &#8220;thanks, but no, thanks&#8221; to the President of the U S of A, the Supreme-Court Appointed &#8220;leader of the free world&#8221;, his old-time buddy, George &#8220;IÂ´m kinÂ´a disappointed I destroyed a whole country for no good reason&#8221; Bush? Of course not! I doubt there was any room for strategic decision-making here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4716</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s alright maremoto. I must say, you are probably the most passionate person on the blog, which I do like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s alright maremoto. I must say, you are probably the most passionate person on the blog, which I do like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maremoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-4715</link>
		<dc:creator>maremoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cipcol.org/?p=722#comment-4715</guid>
		<description>sorry

absolutely right

I apologize  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry</p>
<p>absolutely right</p>
<p>I apologize  <img src='http://www.cipcol.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
