Here is a translation of the inaugural post that Ãlvaro Jiménez and I published to our joint blog about U.S.-Colombian relations, which is appearing on a new Colombian political news and analysis website, La Silla VacÃa. The site’s name, “The Empty Chair,” refers to a political reform proposal, which failed in Colombia’s Congress in 2007, that would have left empty the congressional seats of legislators who lost their posts due to their ties to paramilitary groups.
Colombia, off of Obama’s itinerary
Look at this list of U.S. contacts with leaders from the region, all of them in a three-week period, with three weeks remaining before the beginning of the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago. This list reveals an interesting pattern:
- March 13: Obama places a phone call to President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner of Argentina.
- March 14: Obama hosts Brazilian President Lula in Washington.
- March 18: Obama places a phone call to El Salvador’s president-elect, Mauricio Funes.
- March 25-26: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visits Mexico.
- March 27-28: Vice President Joe Biden visits Chile to meet with the leaders of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay.
- March 29-30: Biden visits Costa Rica to meet with the presidents of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Panama, and high officials from Honduras and Nicaragua.
- April 2: Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Attorney-General Eric Holder visit Mexico.
The pattern? There is only one example of contact with Colombia during this period:
- March 29: The secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, attends the Inter-American Development Bank summit in MedellÃn. Geithner holds a brief bilateral meeting with President Uribe at 7:30 that Saturday evening.
This represents a notable change from the last few years of the Bush administration, whose image in the hemisphere was so poor that it sometimes seemed like they were desperately clinging to the figure of Ãlvaro Uribe as the last good friend they had left in Latin America.
Obviously, after that experience, the Obama administration has a strong incentive to direct its energies toward other countries in the region beyond Colombia. The objective of all these trips and visits is, in a few words, to “re-start” many bilateral relationships that had become stuck like an old Windows computer.
For the United States, it is understandably desirable to have Colombia as one ally among several, instead of the only remaining ally in the entire region. But for Ãlvaro Uribe’s administration, this change is terrible news.
If Colombia is just “a” friend, and not “the” friend, the new administration in Washington will feel more comfortable distancing itself from those aspects of the Uribe administration that are troubling. Like the unpunished murders of unionists, extrajudicial executions, para-politics, the DAS wiretaps, and the president’s constant verbal attacks on his critics, whom he apparently cannot distinguish from terrorists.
And if, as everything seems to indicate, President Uribe is headed toward a second reelection, the relationship will become more complicated. Relations will probably continue to be cordial, but no high Obama administration official will enjoy sharing the frame of a photograph with a leader who has shown himself unable to part with power.
With their recent petulant calls for Colombia to distance itself from the United States, Vice President Francisco Santos and former presidential advisor Jose Obdulio Gaviria fed concerns in the United States that the current administration in Colombia lacks the necessary maturity and perspective to be a solid partner. These qualities can be found in greater quantities elsewhere, like in Brazil and Mexico.
But Santos and Gaviria are not entirely wrong when they talk about the need to de-emphasize the bilateral relationship with the United States and diversify Colombia’s friendships with “Europe, China, India and the Arabs.”
The reality is that the United States, for months now, has already been going around the region trying to do the same thing.

April 2nd, 2009 at 11:53 am
I think the name of the new website also refers to the empty seat left by FARC commander Tirofijo when he stood up President Pastrana at the beginning of peace talks. There is a now-famous image burned into the memory of many hopeful Colombians of Pastrana literally sitting at the negotiating table next to an empty seat (i.e. the one reserved for Tirofijo).
The website is a great project. I’m looking forward to having another site to help triangulate…
April 2nd, 2009 at 9:45 pm
With Lula pronouncing that blue-eyed white people are to blame for the financial crisis and Mexico’s deep tradition of corruption, I find it hard to believe that Brazil and Mexico are more mature than Colombia.
April 3rd, 2009 at 1:10 am
I think you are wrong on this, Adam. Not for the usual ideological reasons. But because I am hearing from Uribista friends that the Obamatons are trying to be good friends. Obviously, we have different sources, fwiw.
April 3rd, 2009 at 10:36 am
Obama is placating his party at this time because he doesn’t want to sidetrack other issues… give him a little more time, he’ll eventually channel more of his time and effort on Colombia… and it will look something like a Free Trade Agreement… Hillary wants it, she’ll get it. The Clintons are fans of Colombia.
The gestures to some of the other countries in the region are real attempts to mend some broken ties, but none are there to remotely replace Colombia’s relationship with the US. It’s all economics… Brazil is a necessary trading partner… especially given that our auto companies receive a substantial amount of iron ore for their cars from Brazil… there’s a lot of additional trade occurring in other areas as well. Mexico is all about economics as well… the drug war is a front… not as out-of-control as the media is making it out to be. Heck it would be an insignificant problem in Mexico if it were not for rampant corruption in that country.
April 4th, 2009 at 4:33 am
[...] bookmarks tagged colombia Plan Colombia and Beyond » Colombia, off of Obama… saved by 2 others magicmiley bookmarked on 04/04/09 | [...]
April 5th, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Good point, Chris. To understand the depth of the Clintons’ feelings for Colombia, this speech, here, the very last part of it, last question, I think it is part 5, is worth listening to.
http://www.iadb.org/news/videos.cfm?Language=English&id=5264&page=1&keywords=Clinton&category=