![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Washington, D.C.,
June 26, 2009
President Obama Must Raise Human Rights Concerns with Colombian President
Opportunity to Show Human Rights are Important for Both U.S. Allies and Adversaries
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe’s meeting with President Obama on Monday comes at a controversial moment. President Uribe is embroiled in a number of human rights, corruption and abuse of power scandals. The Colombian President is seriously considering amending the constitution to run for a third term in office. Meanwhile, a free trade agreement remains stalled in the U.S. Congress.
“It is crucial that President Obama send the right message, with the right tone. Colombia is a close partner of the United States, which makes it all the more important that we voice concerns about human rights violations and the rule of law,†said Gimena Sánchez Garzoli, senior associate for Colombia, Washington Office on Latin America.
In a scandal even more shocking than Watergate, evidence continues to emerge that for seven years, Mr. Uribe’s presidential intelligence agency (DAS) engaged in illegal wiretaps and surveillance of hundreds of human rights defenders, journalists, labor leaders, opposition politicians, and Supreme Court judges. The presidential agency spied on their families, and even international and U.S.-based human rights organizations. Still worse, DAS agents reportedly sent a bloody doll to a human rights activist, threatening her daughter.
“Wiretapping is just the tip of the iceberg. Far from protecting human rights defenders, the intelligence agency has engaged in ‘intelligence offensives’ that included sending defenders death threats and initiating malicious criminal investigations against them for bogus links to terrorism,†said Andrew Hudson, senior associate, Human Rights First.
Some of the most frequent targets of the DAS spying have been Supreme Court judges charged with investigating widespread allegations of ties between the president’s political allies and drug-funded paramilitary death squads. The so-called “para-politics†scandal has put over 30 percent of Colombia’s Congress, and many governors and mayors, under investigation, on trial, or behind bars. Nearly all of the implicated politicians are members of pro-Uribe parties.
Meanwhile, months after Colombians were shocked by revelations that the army killed dozens of young men in a Bogota slum, government forces continue to murder innocent civilians with tragic frequency. Colombian human rights groups are still documenting new cases of extrajudicial executions and an alarming spike in forced disappearances.
“We now know of more than a thousand cases of innocent civilians killed since 2002. This is a systematic practice shrouded by impunity, as very few of these cases have resulted in convictions. This situation is aggravated by President Uribe’s insistence on downplaying the problem, or even implying that the accusations are a guerrilla strategy,†said Kelly Nicholls, executive director, U.S. Office on Colombia.
President Uribe exacerbates these problems by regularly labeling non-violent human rights activists as terrorists. For example, President Uribe recently spoke on national television about renowned human rights journalist Hollman Morris, saying that his journalism was “deceitful and a glorification of terrorism†and that it “is important to distinguish between friends of terrorists who act as journalists and those who are real journalists.†Such attacks endanger human rights defenders, publicly stigmatize them, unleash the intelligence services against them and result in a surge of death threats.
Colombia continues to be the most dangerous place in the world for labor activists. So far this year, 21 trade unionists have been assassinated. Efforts to bring perpetrators to justice are inadequate as 95% of labor killings remain unpunished.
For these reasons, it is imperative that President Obama, both publicly and privately, convey a strong message on human rights to his Colombian counterpart.
“President Obama should make clear that U.S. support comes with a price: respect for freedom of expression and other human rights. Right now, President Obama is being asked to raise these concerns more strongly with Iran. It is important that close allies hear the same message,†said Lisa Haugaard, Executive Director, Latin America Working Group.
President Uribe’s visit comes at a time when Colombia is awaiting his final word on whether he will run for a third term in May 2010, a step that will require the country to amend its constitution. If he runs and wins, President Uribe will face few checks on executive power, as his chosen political allies will be in control of all judicial and oversight bodies.
“Measures that affect democratic checks and balances or institutional stability, such as re-election, are Colombia’s internal business,†said Adam Isacson, Director of the Colombia Program, the Center for International Policy. “Nonetheless, while in Washington, President Uribe should hear what several U.S. editorials have already expressed: changes to the country’s democratic order can affect U.S. interests, and U.S. – Colombia relations.â€
###
For further information contact:
- Kelly Nicholls, U.S. Office on Colombia, (202) 232 8090, kelly@usofficeoncolombia.org
- Gimena Sánchez Garzoli, Washington Office on Latin America, (202) 797-2171, GSanchez@wola.org
- Lisa Haugaard, Latin America Working Group, (202) 546 7010, lisah@lawg.org
- Adam Isacson, Center for International Policy, (202) 232 3317, isacson@ciponline.org
- Andrew Hudson, Human Rights First, (212) 845 5200, hudsona@humanrightsfirst.org
Suggested questions and further background information
Uribe’s visit offers U.S. journalists an opportunity to ask President Uribe the following questions:
Why are labor union killings still taking place in Colombia?
Colombia continues to be the most dangerous place for labor activists. So far 21 trade unionists were assassinated in 2009 and efforts to bring perpetrators to justice are inadequate. The impunity rate in such cases remains 95%.
Why is the Colombian government undermining freedom of expression?
In a still-unfolding scandal, Colombia’s presidential intelligence agency (DAS) was discovered to be systematically conducting surveillance without warrants, which included tapping the phones and email of hundreds of human rights defenders, journalists, members of the political opposition and Supreme Court judges. More than just wiretapping, the agency was reportedly involved in sending death threats to defenders and fabricating intelligence for use in trumped-up criminal charges. This scandal constitutes a serious assault upon freedom of expression, association and privacy. In addition, aggressive and unsubstantiated statements by high-level Colombian officials, including President Uribe, continue to undermine the work and safety of human rights defenders, publicly stigmatizing them, unleashing the intelligence services against them and putting their security at risk.
Why is it taking so long to clean up Colombia’s political institutions?
Today, 77 members of the Colombian Congress elected in 2006—more than 30 percent of the legislature—are under investigation, in jail or on trial for links to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) paramilitaries, a group considered a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the State Department. During the first part of this decade, the AUC was responsible for three-quarters of conflict-related killings of Colombian civilians. Most of these AUC-linked politicians represent pro-government political parties. Despite steps taken, including an ongoing investigation of President Uribe’s cousin and political ally Mario Uribe, the process is moving slowly.
Why do most extrajudicial execution cases remain in impunity?
Government forces continue to commit extrajudicial executions and other abuses, with the vast majority remaining in impunity. According to the Colombian Attorney-General Human Rights Unit’s own statistics, of the 1,025 cases of alleged extrajudicial killings assigned to the unit from 2002 to April 2009, only 16 have resulted in conviction. UN Special Rapporteur Philip Alston, who conducted a special mission on the issue last week, called the killings “cold-blooded, premeditated murder of innocent civilians for profit†and noted that while the most well-known “killings were undeniably blatant and obscene, my investigation showed that they were but the tip of the iceberg.â€
For more information on this troubling crime see the U.S. Office on Colombia’s report, “A State of Impunity in Colombia,†released this week.
Indiscriminate use of force by members of the armed forces also remains a concern, especially in Afro-Colombian and indigenous territories. On May 3rd 2009 a Colombian military helicopter indiscriminately machine-gunned several Afro-Colombian areas in Lopez de Micay, in the southwestern department of Cauca. Among the victims was a thirteen year old boy.
Why is the humanitarian crisis increasing in Colombia?
Over 4 million Colombians have been internally displaced by violence, and an estimated 500,000-750,000 refugees have fled to other countries. Colombia has the largest internally displaced (IDP) population in the world, UNHCR recently reported. According to the Colombian group CODHES, 380,000 people were newly displaced in 2008, an increase of 24% from 2007. IDPs are not Colombia’s only humanitarian problem; a recent UNICEF report notes that landmines are found in 31 out of Colombia’s 32 departments. Colombia has more landmine victims that any other country in the world, one-third of them children.






June 26th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
I don’t know about you, but Obama doesn’t seem to have a solid track record on taking real action against human rights abuses. He’ll talk you to death about supporting human rights measures, but that’s about it.
June 26th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Well a good parallel here in terms of what actions he takes, or the position asserted by the Obama administration might be Jimmy Carter with El Salvador 1978-1980. Carter in many ways aggravated the situation by being indirect in his approach. On one hand he criticized death squad activity by extra-legal paramilitary groups (ORDEN, FALANGE) while at the same time sending a degree of aid and support to the Salvadorian Armed Forces. However, he failed to make the crucial connection between the paramilitaries and the armed forces.
Likewise in Colombia. Obama will likely praise the efforts of the Uribe admin, continue to provide large amounts of aid to the armed forces, and he will criticize the assassination of labor leaders, and the abuse of human rights by the shadowy forces of the left and the right. However, the distinction will not be made (publicly at least) between paramilitaries, and violence against civil society, and the Colombian Armed Forces.
June 27th, 2009 at 2:20 am
Why should Uribe take anything Obama says seriously? From his point of view, the US spent years negotiating a tough free trade treaty, forced Colombia to change its constitution, forced Colombia to go to an accusatory system judicially to help win convictions, is stuck with leftist judges who don’t LIKE to win convictions because they don’t like free trade, and forced Colombia to make amendment after amendment after amendment to its pact, all to please labor and environmental interest groups yet IT’S NEVER GOOD ENOUGH. The demands keep coming. Here the US negotiated a treaty and still hasn’t the balls to out it to a vote, what’s he supposed to think about that as a nation of its word? I don’t think he ought to listen to a thing from Obama unless it’s a ‘thank you.’
The irony of all this jacking around can’t be lost on Uribe – that all these human rights problems and violence are rooted in the fact that a large part of the Democratic voting base just can’t stop putting that white powder up their noses.
Remember the real foundation of Colombia’s problems: The gringo appetite for cocaine. None of the violent crap going on in Colombia – neither the FARC, the ELN, the para scum nor the drug traffickers – would be there at all were it not for the gringo appetite for cocaine and all those corrupting gringo dollars that enable FARC and the other creeps to buy weapons and build bombs and kill people. Obama himself admitted to being a user of cocaine in his bio, so he can’t complain, he was part of the problem. I’d like to see him apologize for his personal use of cocaine myself – how many people got murdered so he could snort happily and nearly destroy Colombia? He needs to lead by example. But I doubt he will. He’ll just point the bony finger, say everything is Uribe’s fault, and retreat back into his shell and let Jim McGovern play moral paragon of virtue, something he’s not.
June 27th, 2009 at 2:37 am
Doesn’t make me too happy, to be honest it’s only an amusing absurdity and nothing more.
But how the hell does anyone expect that those 95% of labor murders will ever be resolved?
Impunity affects hundreds of thousands of murders in Colombia, that’s just a drop in the bucket.
How can anyone expect union killings and “false positives” to end under the current situation?
Colombia is a violent country and a violent country at war. Wake up.
Stop kidding yourselves. In many ways it will never change, for real, at least until the conflict is over if not even much later, no matter what is done or demanded or withheld or extorted. That’s the big secret many people don’t want to see because it’s not convenient to admit it.
Why is this the case? Because even Santa Claus the Wise won’t be able to stem the tide with his magic wand and good intentions. The problem is not Uribe. He’s just the noisy scapegoat.
You’d need to change Colombian society as a whole and that can’t happen in its current state.
You need the war to end and you need time for those changes to happen. Nothing less.
Oh, reply, but whether you want to accept it or not, the reality of abuses is not much different from what it was ten years ago or what it’ll probably be ten years into the future. It’s logical.
Wars are supposed to be ugly. Trying to “civilize” war is an exercise in moralistic futility, a contradiction between righteousness and a pure logic that has lasted for thousands of years.
End the war and you’ll begin to reduce the abuses, maybe even end them in a few decades. But the war will only end when someone wins or the next closest thing, a negotiation between a defeated party and a victor. Everything else is fleeting hope. That’s been proven thrice already if not several times more. This letter just evades the issue and concentrates on politicking.
What has changed is whether these “discoveries” were a national or international talking point or not, for obvious political purposes more than anything else, not because of their existence.
Does anyone with an idea of what Colombian history is like truly believe this began with Uribe?
Uribe is an obvious bad boy who sets himself up quite beautifully for this kind of complaints and criticisms due to his malfunctioning logic and poor temper, since he’s too paranoid and dirty despite having some necessary security policies that had been lacking, but when someone else with a better profile and behavior becomes president, I can see this buzz becoming less noisy even if abuses are still 80-90% identical to the current levels, just because there will not be an easy target to bully and point a big red finger at. Trust me, I can see that coming.
Even without Uribe saying dumb and aggressive statements the situation will be unchanged at its core until people realize what’s really holding back progress. It’s not him, it’s the overall situation and society. I’m losing all my time here but that’s the bloody reality of this world.
Regards,
-Marcos
June 27th, 2009 at 5:50 am
Marcos I think your viewpoint is right.
June 27th, 2009 at 9:02 am
I would remind blog readers that the FARC, the ELN, and numerous other insurgent movements–Colombian “democracy” has seen something like a dozen or more of these movements over the past 50 years–existed before any gringo appetite for cocaine. And the “para scum” also antedates cocaine.
One hopes the Obama administration at least–if not others in Washington–is sophisticated enough not to believe “Camilla”s” nonsense. It is specious argumentation at its finest, and falls in the category of sophistic, sound-bite political tomfoolery.
June 27th, 2009 at 9:30 am
Camilo, she’s been lying about for a long time now, to the point some of us believe she might be Mary O’grady, the foolish twerp from the WSJ.
June 27th, 2009 at 10:49 am
“Eradication is a waste of money”
Richard Holbrooke, U.S. envoy for Afghanistan
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090627/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_us_afghanistan
June 27th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
The irony of all this jacking around can’t be lost on Uribe – that all these human rights problems and violence are rooted in the fact that a large part of the Democratic voting base just can’t stop putting that white powder up their noses.
When you have no facts, go straight for the libel. Such is the level of Camila’s erudition.
June 27th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
For my money, I guess Republicans are also pretty good at snorting.
June 28th, 2009 at 12:45 am
Lawrence Kudlow has been in rehab for coke.
July 1st, 2009 at 3:48 am
Let’s not take this as an endorsement of coke, but one could make the argument that the problem – the key variable contributing to the perpetuation of the armed conflict – is a prohibition-based U.S. drug policy, as opposed to the drugs themselves.